Geren et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
David Geren and Sheila K Geren |
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, John Does, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson International and DePuy Inc |
4:2019cv00771 |
November 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Billy Roy Wilson |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 E-MAIL received from U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas, confirming the case was received and opened in their district as case number 3:19-cv-02776. (jak) |
Filing 2 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-326) transferring this case to the Northern District of Texas for proceedings in MDL No. 2244 In Re: Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. Signed by the Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols. (jak) |
Docket Note: Pursuant to #2 Conditional Transfer Order, this case was transferred to the U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas on this date as part of MDL No. 2244 In Re: Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. (jak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by David Geren, Sheila K Geren. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $400 paid, Receipt #LIT074601.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.