Manning v. Payne et al
| Travis Manning |
| Dexter Payne, Angela Jenkins, Paul Walter, Wanda Brown Brooks, Joseph Efird, Joseph Thomas, M Hurst, Marshall Dale Reed, Does, Fidel Cobb, William McNairy, Morieon Kelly, Jeremy Andrews, Roosevelt Barden, James Dycus and Emily Branch |
| 4:2019cv00854 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| James M Moody |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #19 Motion for Reconsideration. Manning has been ordered to file an amended complaint. If after screening the amended complaint, the Court determines that service is appropriate and there are problems serving the defendants, the Court may extend the time for service under Fed. R. Civil P. 4(m). Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 1/29/2020.(dml)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION for Reconsideration re 13 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, by Travis Manning. (kdr) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER that Manning file an amended complaint conforming to this order within 30 days; and directing the Clerk of Court to send Manning a blank 1983 form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 1/23/2020. (ljb)
|
|
Filing 17
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #16 Motion for Status. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff Manning a copy of Doc. No. #15 , as well as a copy of the docket sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 1/13/2020. (cfd)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Status by Travis Manning. (llg) |
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Travis Manning. (llg) |
|
Filing 14
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend as Moot. This motion appears to be a duplicate of Doc. No. 7, which has been granted. See Doc. No. 9. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 1/2/2020.(dml)
|
|
Filing 13
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #11 Motion to Appoint Counsel. This motion appears to be a duplicate of Doc. No. 8 which has been denied. See Doc. No. 10. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 1/2/2020.(dml)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #2 Complaint by Travis Manning. (llg) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Travis Manning. (llg) (Docket text modified on 1/3/2020 to correct the filing event) (jak) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #11 Motion. CORRECTION: The docket entry was modified to correct the filing event as "MOTION to Appoint Counsel" as marked on the document. (jak) |
|
Filing 10
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. A civil litigant does not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in a civil action but the Court may appoint counsel at its discretion. 28 U.S.C. s. 1915(e)(1). The Court has considered plaintiff's need for an attorney, the likelihood that plaintiff will benefit from assistance of counsel, the factual complexity of the case, the plaintiff's ability to investigate and present his case, and the complexity of the legal issues. In considering these factors, the Court finds that plaintiff's claims do not appear legally or factually complex, and it appears he is capable of prosecuting his claims without appointed counsel at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 12/30/2019.(dml)
|
|
Filing 9
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #7 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff may have an additional 30 days to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff should file his complaint on or before February 1, 2020, or his complaint may be dismissed. Plaintiff should not need to conduct legal research to set forth the factual basis for his complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 12/30/2019. (dml)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Travis Manning. (ljb) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time by Travis Manning. (ljb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to the Court by Travis Manning. (ljb) |
|
Filing 5
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS granting #1 IFP motion; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's institutional account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the East Arkansas Regional Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralization Bank Office, and the ADC Compliance Office; directing Manning to amend his complaint within 30 days from the date of this Order; and directing the Clerk of Court to send a blank 1983 complaint form to Manning. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 12/3/2019. (ljb)
|
| Filing 4 BRIEF and MEMORANDUM of Law In Support of #3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Travis Manning. (llg) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Travis Manning. (llg) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Travis Manning. (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Travis Manning. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
