Bailey v. Grandy
| Thomas Dorsey Bailey, III |
| Kanesha N Grandy |
| 4:2019cv00906 |
| December 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ajt) |
Filing 6
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to #5 Order entered in this matter on this date, this case is dismissed with prejudice, as barred by res judicata and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 01/06/2020. (ajt)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER adopting in their entirety #3 proposed findings and recommendations; and dismissing with prejudice #2 Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant as barred by re judicata and for failure to state a claim. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 01/06/2020. (ajt)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Order to ADC Compliance Office, ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, and the Warden of the Ouachita River Unit. Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/19/2019. (ajt)
|
|
Filing 3
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #2 Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant be DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by res judicata and for failure to state a claim. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Objections are due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/19/2019. (lmc)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Kanesha N Grandy filed by Thomas Dorsey Bailey, III. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Thomas Dorsey Bailey, III. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bailey v. Grandy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kanesha N Grandy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Dorsey Bailey, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
