Patterson v. American Income Life Insurance Co et al
| Audra Patterson |
| American Income Life Insurance Co and Aaron Blake Ralston |
| 4:2019cv00918 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 motion for extension of time to file responsive pleading and stipulation for tolling; extending defendants' deadline to file a responsive pleading to Ms. Patterson's complaint until and including 2/18/2020; and tolling the statute of limitations for all potential future opt-ins for 30 days. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/15/2020. (jbh)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time to File Responsive Pleading by American Income Life Insurance Co (Waddell, William) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Amber Wilson Bagley on behalf of Aaron Blake Ralston (Bagley, Amber) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by William A. Waddell, Jr on behalf of American Income Life Insurance Co (Waddell, William) |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - COLLECTIVE ACTION against All Defendants, filed by Audra Patterson. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT075287.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
