Sturgeon v. Social Security Administration
Nikki Sturgeon |
Social Security Administration |
4:2019cv00946 |
December 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jerome T Kearney |
James M Moody |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgement filed by Nikki Sturgeon. (Goetz, David) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave for the Pro Hac Vice Admission of David B. Goetz, Esquire on behalf of Plaintiff. David B. Goetz is hereby admitted to appear before this Court as counsel of record for plaintiff in this action. The Local Rule requiring non-enrolled attorneys to designate local counsel is hereby waived for the limited purpose of this case. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/27/2020. (jbh) |
Filing 8 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER terminating #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 01/02/2020. (glr) |
Filing 7 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff may proceed without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 01/02/2020. (glr) |
Filing 6 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - DISREGARD. (Goetz, David) (Docket text modified on 1/2/2020 pursuant to instructions from the filing party.) (thd). |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nikki Sturgeon (Goetz, David) |
Filing 4 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court notifying party that #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #2 Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet lack an original signature (F.R.Cv.P. 11(a) and Local Rule 5.5(c)(1)). (cmn) |
Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and forwarded to Plaintiff's counsel for service. (ajt) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #6 Amended Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to indicate the document was filed in error. (thd) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by David B. Goetz. Fee $100 received. Receipt number LIT075401. Filed by Nikki Sturgeon. (bmd) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed by Nikki Sturgeon against Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bmd) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nikki Sturgeon. (bmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sturgeon v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nikki Sturgeon | |
Represented By: | David B. Goetz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Stacey Elise McCord |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.