Whitworth v. Wright et al
Anderson Loyd Whitworth |
Brett Capenter, Rodney Wright and Joe Traylor |
4:2020cv00037 |
January 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
J Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #3 Initial Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified as follows, "INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS denying, without prejudice #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis..." as marked on the document. (cmn) |
Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS denying, without prejudice #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; the Clerk is directed to send plaintiff another IFP application along with a copy of this Order; plaintiff must (1) complete and sign the IFP application; (2) have an authorized jail/prison official complete and sign the trust fund account statement and certificate; and (3) return all forms to the Clerk by 2/10/20; if plaintiff fails to do so, his case will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 1/10/20. (tjb) (Docket text modified on 1/13/2020 to correct the description.)(cmn) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Anderson Loyd Whitworth. (ljb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anderson Loyd Whitworth. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.