Howard v. Spearman et al
Jeremy Howard |
Dwight Spearman, II and Samuel Spearman |
4:2020cv00055 |
January 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Lee P Rudofsky |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #5 Motion for Raynique Keelen to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 03/02/2020. (bgr) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Raynique Keelen. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-3651195. Filed by All Plaintiffs (Lausten, Kristin) |
Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 4/7/2020 and Jury Trial set for 3/8/2021 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock, Arkansas Courtroom #2A before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 1/16/2020. (hml) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Dwight Spearman, II, Samuel Spearman.(ajt) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Jeremy Howard.(ajt) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dwight Spearman, II, Samuel Spearman from Lonoke County Circuit Court, case number 43CV-19-1107. Fee $400 paid, receipt number LIT075641. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.