Holmes et al v. Stetson Courier Inc
Melissa Garner, Patrick Norris, Roy Holmes and Tina Alexander |
Stetson Courier Southeast Inc, John Stetson and Stetson Courier Inc |
4:2020cv00191 |
February 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT Second Amended Complaint against All Defendants, filed by Roy Holmes, Tina Alexander, Patrick Norris, Melissa Garner(Hoyt, Blake) |
Filing 4 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: Motion to amend, Doc. #3 , granted. Second amended complaint due by 20 April 2020. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/15/2020. (slb) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Hoyt, Blake) |
Filing 2 FIRST AMENDED Complaint-Collective Action against Stetson Courier Inc, John Stetson, filed by Roy Holmes, Tina Alexander, Patrick Norris, Melissa Garner (summonses issued and given to attorney's office) (jap) |
Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT-COLLECTIVE ACTION against Stetson Courier Southeast Inc filed by Roy Holmes, Tina Alexander, Patrick Norris, Melissa Garner. (Fee $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT076174.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.