Ashley v. Ray
| Ricky Ashley |
| J Thomas Ray |
| 4:2020cv00285 |
| March 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER of USCA as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Ricky Ashley: The Clerk of the district court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER. (ajt)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER of USCA as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Ricky Ashley: Appellant is directed to pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee, within 30 days of the date of this order. (ajt)
|
| Filing 11 USCA Docketing Letter as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Ricky Ashley. USCA Case Number 20-1875. (ajt) |
| Filing 10 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to #6 Notice of Appeal re #3 Order and #4 Judgment. (ajt) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #8 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 04/28/2020. (ajt)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Ricky Ashley. (ajt) |
| Filing 7 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. Response due by 5/13/2020. (ajt) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order and #4 Judgment by Ricky Ashley. (ajt) |
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jbh) |
|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the #3 order entered today, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/26/2020. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #1 Ricky Ashley's motion to proceed in forma pauperis; and dismissing this case without prejudice. If Ashley would like to continue with this case, he must first pay the filing fee of $400 to the clerk, noting the above style and case number, within thirty days of the date of this order along with a motion to reopen this case. Upon receipt of the full filing fee and his motion, this case will be reopened. An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/26/2020. (jbh)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against J Thomas Ray filed by Ricky Ashley. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ricky Ashley. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ashley v. Ray | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ricky Ashley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: J Thomas Ray | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
