Jones et al v. Burkhalter Technologies Inc et al
| Kenneth Floyd and Carl Jones |
| John Burkhalter and Burkhalter Technologies Inc |
| 4:2020cv00339 |
| March 26, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 6/25/2020. Rule 26(f) Report due by 7/9/2020. Jury Trial set for 4/13/2021 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # A401 before Judge Billy Roy Wilson.Entered at the direction of the Court on 4/17/20. (mmb) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Burkhalter Technologies Inc (Peoples, Ashley) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by John Burkhalter, Burkhalter Technologies Inc.(Peoples, Ashley) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carl Jones, Kenneth Floyd. John Burkhalter served on 3/27/2020; Burkhalter Technologies Inc served on 3/27/2020. (Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - COLLECTIVE ACTION against All Defendants filed by Carl Jones, Kenneth Floyd. Fee $400 received. Receipt Number LIT076592. Summons issued and returned to counsel for service. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
