Lockhart v. Petty et al
| Reginald D Lockhart |
| Eric Petty, Little Rock, City of, Kenneth Wilcox, Does John and Jane 1-4 and Calvin Johnson |
| 4:2020cv00384 |
| April 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #4 Answer. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to include reference to the Jury demand as marked on the document. (jak) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury demand by Calvin Johnson, Little Rock, City of, Eric Petty, Kenneth Wilcox.(Hogan, Rick) (Docket text modified on 6/1/2020 to include reference to the Jury demand)(jak) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Caleb Peter Garcia on behalf of Calvin Johnson, Little Rock, City of, Eric Petty, Kenneth Wilcox (Garcia, Caleb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Rick D. Hogan on behalf of Calvin Johnson, Little Rock, City of, Eric Petty, Kenneth Wilcox (Hogan, Rick) |
| Summons Reissued as to Little Rock, City of and returned to counsel. (llg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Reginald D Lockhart. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $400 paid, Receipt #LIT076779.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
