Ray v. Preferred Roofing Solutions Inc et al
| Benjamin Ray |
| RoofConnect, RoofConnect Management LLC, RoofConnect Logistics Inc, Preferred Roofing Solutions Inc and David Workman |
| 4:2020cv00413 |
| April 16, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by RoofConnect (Duke, Melissa) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by RoofConnect Management LLC (Duke, Melissa) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by RoofConnect Logistics Inc (Duke, Melissa) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Preferred Roofing Solutions Inc (Duke, Melissa) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Preferred Roofing Solutions Inc, RoofConnect, RoofConnect Logistics Inc, RoofConnect Management LLC, David Workman.(Duke, Melissa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander Dylan Clark on behalf of All Defendants (Clark, Alexander) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa McJunkins Duke on behalf of All Defendants (Duke, Melissa) |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Benjamin Ray. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT076871.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
