Machen et al v. Aspen American Insurance Company et al
Billy Randall Machen DDS PA, Machen Real Estate LLC, Billy Randall Machen and Billy Randall Machen DDS PA doing business as Little Rock Family Dental |
Aspen American Insurance Company and Cincinnati Insurance Company |
4:2020cv00451 |
April 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Brian S Miller |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Aspen American Insurance Company. (Richardson, Scott) |
Filing 14 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #13 motion for leave to file. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/21/2020. (stm) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss by Aspen American Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Richardson, Scott) |
Filing 12 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #11 Response to Motion to Dismiss filed by All Plaintiffs. (Crabtree, Danny) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by All Plaintiffs. (Crabtree, Danny) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Aspen American Insurance Company (Richardson, Scott) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #9 Notice of Appearance. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the attorney entering appearance as Mindy M. Medley as marked on the document. (jak) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Mindy M. Medley on behalf of Aspen American Insurance Company (Richardson, Scott)(Docket text modified on 5/4/2020 to correct the attorney entering appearance) (jak) |
Filing 8 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Mindy M. Medley. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 05/01/2020. (rmg) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Aspen American Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(Richardson, Scott) |
Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Aspen American Insurance Company (Richardson, Scott) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Mindy M. Medley. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-3695068. Filed by Aspen American Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Richardson, Scott) |
Filing 4 ADDENDUM filed by Aspen American Insurance Company to #1 Notice of Removal,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Richardson, Scott) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Notice of Removal. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (wrong image file) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to docket entry #1 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak) |
Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Machen Real Estate LLC, Billy Randall Machen, and Billy Randall Machen DDS PA.(kdr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Aspen American Insurance Company from Pulaski County Circuit Court, Case Number 60CV-20-2158. Fee of $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT076964. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/29/2020: #2 Main Document - Correct) (jak). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.