Stewart v. Griffin et al
| Phillip Stewart |
| Rory Griffin and Sondra L Parker |
| 4:2020cv00517 |
| May 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 APPEAL DEFICIENCY NOTICE re #5 Notice of Appeal, #6 Appellate Filing Fee Notice. (ajt) |
| Filing 6 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. Response due by 7/1/2020. (ajt) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #2 Order and #3 Judgment 1983 by Phillip Stewart. (ajt) |
| Filing 4 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak) |
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT: Stewart's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/20/2020. (jak) |
Filing 2
ORDER withdrawing the reference. Stewart's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. If Stewart wants to pursue this case, then he must pay the $400 filing and administrative fees and file a motion to reopen by 6/22/2020. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/20/2020. (jbh)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Phillip Stewart.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
