Sorum v. Payne
Plaintiff: Jeran Sorum
Defendant: Wendy Kelley and Dexter Payne
Case Number: 4:2020cv00547
Filed: May 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Kristine G Baker
Referring Judge: Patricia S Harris
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2020 Filing 11 EXHIBIT - USB Flash Drive containing Exhibit C mp4 file of sexual assault - to #8 Response to Habeas Petition filed by Dexter Payne. USB Flash Drive filed conventionally and maintained in the Clerk's Office. (fjg)
July 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER. Petitioner Jeran Sorum began this case with the assistance of counsel by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Respondent Dexter Payne has now filed a response to the petition. Before giving serious consideration to Payne's assertions, the Court accords Sorum an opportunity to file a reply. In the reply, Sorum should explain why his petition should not be dismissed for the reasons advanced by Payne. Sorum is given up to, and including, August 7, 2020, to file his reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 7/7/2020. (cfd)
July 6, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE by Dexter Payne re #8 Response to Habeas Petition,,,, Conventionally Filed Exhibit (Harris, Christian)
July 6, 2020 Filing 8 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Dexter Payne. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit A - Docket Sheet, State of Arkansas v. Jeran Sorum, Benton County Circuit Court, 04CR-14-415, #3 Exhibit B - Four-Volume Record, Jeran Sorum v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Court of Appeals, CR-16-781, #4 Exhibit D - Appellate Briefs, Jeran Sorum v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Court of Appeals, CR-16-781, #5 Exhibit E - Opinion delivered June 21, 2017, Jeran Sorum v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Supreme Court, CR-16-781, #6 Exhibit F - Appellants Petition for Review, Appellees Response to Petition for Review, and Order Denying Petition for Review, Jeran Sorum v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Court of Appeals, CR-17-577, #7 Exhibit G - One-Volume Record, Jeran Sorum v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Court of Appeals, CR-18-891, #8 Exhibit H - Appellate Briefs, Jeran Sorum v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Court of Appeals, CR-18-891, #9 Exhibit I - Opinion delivered September 4, 2019, Jeran Sorum v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Supreme Court, CR-18-891)(Harris, Christian)
June 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Respondent's motion to extend the time for filing his response is extended seven (7) days making the respondents response due on or before July 6, 2020. Nunc pro tunc to June 29, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 6/30/2020. (cfd)
June 29, 2020 Filing 6 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Dexter Payne (Harris, Christian)
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 motion for extension of time. Payne is given up to, and including 6/29/2020, to file his response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 6/18/2020. (ljb)
June 17, 2020 Filing 4 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Dexter Payne (Harris, Christian)
June 2, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Christian Scholfield Harris on behalf of Dexter Payne (Harris, Christian)
May 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to change the respondent in this case from Wendy Kelley to Dexter Payne; and directing the Clerk of the Court to serve a copy of #1 Sorum's petition and this order on Payne and the Attorney General by regular mail. Respondent is directed to file an answer, motion, or other response within 21 days after service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 5/27/2020. (ljb)
May 21, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jeran Sorum. Exhibit B on disc filed conventionally and maintained in the Clerk's office. (Filing fee of $5 paid, Receipt #LIT077334) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ljb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sorum v. Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeran Sorum
Represented By: Lee Deken Short
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wendy Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Represented By: Christian Scholfield Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?