Lawrence et al v. Ringgold et al
| Janet Lawrence and James Lawrence |
| Rachelle Stewart, Amanda Powell McClain, Robert High and Chris Ringgold |
| 4:2020cv00549 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| D P Marshall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #16 Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by All Plaintiffs. (Sutter, Luther)
|
|
Filing 16
RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by All Plaintiffs. (Sutter, Luther)
|
|
Filing 15
BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Robert High, Amanda Powell McClain, Rachelle Stewart. (Jones, Jamie Marie)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Robert High, Amanda Powell McClain, Rachelle Stewart (Jones, Jamie Marie)
|
|
Filing 13
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 8/10/2020. Jury Trial set for 3/7/2022 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # 1A before Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. Signed at the direction of the Court on 6/26/2020. (slb)
|
|
Filing 12
RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Separate Defendant's Renewed Motion to Dismiss and Incorporated Brief in Support Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Sutter, Luther)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Separate Defendant's Renewed Motion to Dismiss and Incorporated Brief in Support Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) by Chris Ringgold (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Johnson-Jarrett, Laurtaneous)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT directing the Clerk's Office to issue a Notice of Reassignment. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 5/26/2020. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 9
AMENDED ANSWER to Amended #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Robert High, Amanda Powell McClain, Rachelle Stewart (Jones, Jamie Marie)
|
|
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Based on #10 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. (jak)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #7 Complaint. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (wrong image file) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to docket entry #7 and is attached hereto for review by the parties.(jak)
|
|
Filing 6
ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Robert High, Amanda Powell McClain, Rachelle Stewart.(Jones, Jamie Marie)
|
|
Filing 7
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Chris Ringgold, filed by Janet Lawrence, James Lawrence. (jbh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/22/2020: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak).
|
|
Filing 5
PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS re #3 Motion to Dismiss filed by James Lawrence, Janet Lawrence. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 4
BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #3 Motion to Dismiss filed by Chris Ringgold. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Dismiss by Chris Ringgold. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 2
AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Janet Lawrence, James Lawrence. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Robert High, Amanda Powell McClain, Rachelle Stewart from Pulaski County Circuit Court, case number 60CV20-2005. Fee of $400 paid; receipt number LIT077336. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
