Hasty v. Gilky
| Chase Hasty |
| Bill Gilky |
| 4:2020cv00639 |
| May 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's application reflects his financial status while incarcerated at the Yell County Jail. Plaintiff, a former resident at Yell County Detention Center, filed a pro se complaint (Doc. No. #1 ) pursuant to 42.US.C. 1983, on 5/26/2020, and was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). (Doc. No. #2 ). Plaintiff filed a change of address notice indicating that he has now been released from custody. (Doc. No. #3 ). When a plaintiff is released from confinement, the Court's policy is to require re-submission of affidavits to determine whether he should be required to pay all, or a portion of, the fees and costs of the lawsuit. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, he is directed to pay the $350.00 filing fee, or to resubmit an IFP application which reflects his free-world financial status, no later than 30 days after the entry date of this order. Plaintiff's failure to do so will result in the recommended dismissal of this lawsuit. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: the Clerk is directed to forward an IFP application to plaintiff; plaintiff is directed to submit the remainder of his $350.00 filing fee, or to complete and sign the IFP application, and file it, no later than 30 days after the entry date of this order. Plaintiff's failure to do so will result in the recommended dismissal of his complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 6/10/2020. (cfd)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Bill Gilky filed by Chase Hasty. (llg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chase Hasty. (llg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address by Chase Hasty. (jak) |
|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS directing the Clerk of Court to enclose an IFP application along with a copy of this order; and directing Hasty to return a completed IFP application or pay the $400 filing and administrative fees within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 5/29/2020. (ljb)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Bill Gilky filed by Chase Hasty. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hasty v. Gilky | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chase Hasty | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bill Gilky | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
