Phipps v. Woods
| Latrel Phipps |
| Lafayette Woods, Jr and Arkansas, State of |
| 4:2020cv00671 |
| May 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the #4 Order entered today, Petitioner Latrel Phipps's petition for habeas corpus is dismissed, with prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 7/1/2020. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER adopting #3 Recommended Disposition; denying #1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; dismissing this case with prejudice; and denying a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 7/1/2020. (jbh)
|
| Filing 3 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that #1 Petitioner Latrell Phipps's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed, without prejudice. Objections due within 14 days of the entry of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 6/10/2020. (kdr) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Clerk to remove State of Arkansas as a Respondent from the docket sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 6/10/2020. (kdr)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Latrel Phipps. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
