Jackson v. Higgins et al
| James Jackson |
| Eric Higgins, Corey and Hendricks |
| 4:2020cv00686 |
| June 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to James Jackson re #5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. (fjg) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #1 Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Objections are due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 07/07/2020. (lmc) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to James Jackson re #1 Complaint filed by James Jackson (jap) |
| Filing 3 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to James Jackson re #2 Order. (fjg) |
Filing 2
ORDER directing Plaintiff Jackson to submit either the $400 statutory filing fee or an In Forma Pauperis within 30 days of the entry date of this Order; and directing the Clerk to send to Plaintiff an In Forma Pauperis Motion, together with the filing fee calculation sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 06/03/2020. (ajt)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by James Jackson.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
