Reed v. Caterpillar Inc
Tenecia Reed |
Caterpillar Inc |
4:2020cv00717 |
June 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Lee P Rudofsky |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice by Tenecia Reed. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 16 SEALED DOCUMENT. (fjg) |
Filing 15 SEALED BRIEF. (fjg) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Caterpillar Inc (Berry, Michael) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Joseph Berry on behalf of All Defendants (Berry, Michael) |
Filing 12 AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 1/6/2021. (ljb) |
Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Caterpillar Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Kolb, Cynthia) |
Filing 10 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 9/27/2021 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock, Arkansas Courtroom #2A before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Motions to Amend and Join Other Parties due by 1/29/2021; Discovery due by 4/30/2021; Motions due by 5/31/2021; Status Report due by 5/31/2021; and Pretrial Disclosure Sheet due by 8/27/2021. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 9/28/2020. (hml) |
Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Caterpillar Inc. (Amended) (Kolb, Cynthia) |
Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Caterpillar Inc. (Joint Report) (Kolb, Cynthia) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint Stipulation of Dismmissal With Prejudice of First and Second Claims for Relief of Plaintiff's Complaint by Caterpillar Inc. (Kolb, Cynthia) |
Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 9/28/2020 and Jury Trial set for 9/27/2021 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock, Arkansas Courtroom #2A before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 7/7/2020. (hml) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Caterpillar Inc (Kolb, Cynthia) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory James Northen on behalf of Caterpillar Inc (Northen, Gregory) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Caterpillar Inc.(Kolb, Cynthia) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tenecia Reed. Caterpillar Inc served on 6/16/2020. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT against Caterpillar Inc filed by Tenecia Reed. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $400 paid, Receipt #LIT077565.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Reed v. Caterpillar Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tenecia Reed | |
Represented By: | Lydia Hicks Hamlet |
Represented By: | Joshua Sanford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Caterpillar Inc | |
Represented By: | Gregory James Northen |
Represented By: | Cynthia W. Kolb |
Represented By: | Michael Joseph Berry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.