Marshall v. Payne
| Kenneth Ray Marshall |
| Dexter Payne |
| 4:2020cv00732 |
| June 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| James M Moody |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Dexter Payne. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit A - Record, Kenneth Marshall v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Supreme Court, CR-16-63, #3 Exhibit B - Appellate Briefs, Kenneth Marshall v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Supreme Court, CR-16-63, #4 Exhibit B - Appellate Briefs, Kenneth Marshall v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Supreme Court, CR-16-63, #5 Exhibit B - Appellate Briefs, Kenneth Marshall v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Supreme Court, CR-16-63, #6 Exhibit B - Appellate Briefs, Kenneth Marshall v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Supreme Court, CR-16-63, #7 Exhibit C - Opinion delivered December 7, 2017, Kenneth Marshall v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Supreme Court, CR-16-63, #8 Exhibit D - Record, Kenneth Marshall v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Supreme Court, CR-19-232, #9 Exhibit E - Appellate Briefs, Kenneth Marshall v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Supreme Court, CR-19-232, #10 Exhibit F - Opinion delivered February 20, 2020, Kenneth Marshall v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas Supreme Court, CR-19-121)(Harris, Christian) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Christian Scholfield Harris on behalf of Dexter Payne (Harris, Christian) |
Filing 5
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to serve a copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this Order on the respondent and the Arkansas Attorney General by regular mail; and directing the respondent to file an answer, motion, or other response to the petition, in conformity with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases in the United States District Courts, within 21 days after service of this petition, exclusive of the day of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 6/29/2020. (jbh)
|
| Filing 4 Filing fee received: $5, receipt number LIT077809. (Original receipt mailed.) (llg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Kenneth Ray Marshall. (llg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing of Calculation Sheet and Certificate of Prisoner Account by Kenneth Ray Marshall. (kdr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kenneth Ray Marshall.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marshall v. Payne | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dexter Payne | |
| Represented By: | Christian Scholfield Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kenneth Ray Marshall | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
