Ashley v. Payne
Ricky Ashley |
Clarence Thomas and Dexter Payne |
4:2020cv00788 |
June 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
Joe J Volpe |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT: Ashley's petition is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/24/2020. (jak) |
Filing 5 ORDER adopting #4 Recommendation. Ashley's petition will be dismissed without prejudice. No certificate of appealability will issue. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/24/2020. (jak) |
Filing 4 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Mr. Ashley's 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed and the requested relief be denied #2 . No certificate of appealability be issued. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/30/2020. (lej) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting Petitioner's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit #1 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/29/2020. (lej) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ricky Ashley. (llg) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ricky Ashley. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.