Pitts v. Cummins Unit et al
Kenneth Ray Pitts |
Dexter Payne, Correct Care Solutions, Cummins Unit and Arkansas Division of Corrections |
4:2020cv00793 |
June 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jerome T Kearney |
James M Moody |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER of USCA as to 13 Notice of Appeal filed by Kenneth Ray Pitts: The Clerk of the district court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER. (ajt) |
Filing 17 ORDER of USCA as to 13 Notice of Appeal filed by Kenneth Ray Pitts: Appellant is directed to pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee, within 30 days of the date of this order. (ajt) |
Filing 16 USCA Docketing Letter as to 13 Notice of Appeal filed by Kenneth Ray Pitts. USCA Case Number 20-2647. (jbh) |
Filing 15 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to 13 Notice of Appeal re #6 Order and #7 Judgment. (ajt) |
Filing 14 ORDER denying #9 , #10 , #11 , and #12 motions. Plaintiff is not entitled to the relief requested in any of these motions. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/5/2020. (ljb) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Order and #7 Judgment by Kenneth Ray Pitts. (No separate document, see docket entry #12 .) (ajt) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Kenneth Ray Pitts. (ajt) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Order by Kenneth Ray Pitts. (ajt) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Order by Kenneth Ray Pitts. (ajt) |
Filing 9 MOTION for to Objection the Magistrate's Judge Order by Kenneth Ray Pitts. (ajt) |
Filing 8 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ljb) |
Filing 7 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to #6 Order entered this date, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 7/24/2020. (ljb) |
Filing 6 ORDER adopting #4 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; denying #1 and #3 Motions to Proceed in forma pauperis; and dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 7/24/2020. (ljb) |
Filing 5 OBJECTION to #4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Kenneth Ray Pitts. (ljb) |
Filing 4 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #1 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and #3 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED. Should Plaintiff wish to continue prosecuting this case, he be required to submit the statutory filing fee of $400 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number within 10 days of the date of this Order, along with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. Objections are due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 07/01/2020. (lmc) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenneth Ray Pitts. (kdr) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Kenneth Ray Pitts.(kdr) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenneth Ray Pitts. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.