Trust v. Kupfer et al
| Marthella Johnson Trust |
| John Doe, Patty Kupfer and Arkansas Department of Labor |
| 4:2020cv00873 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against all Defendants filed by Marthella Johnson Trust. Summons issued as to Arkansas Department of Labor and returned to party for service. (fjg) |
| Summons Reissued as to Patty Kupfer and returned to party for service. (fjg) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marthella Johnson Trust. Patty Kupfer served on 7/30/2020. (jap) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by Patty Kupfer (Couch, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Marthella Johnson Trust. Fee $400 received. Receipt Number LIT078276. Summons issued and returned to Pro Se Plaintiff for service. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bmd) (Docket text modified on 7/30/2020 to correct the receipt number) (jak) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the receipt number as LIT078276 due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. (jak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
