Youngberg v. McGilton et al
| Charles J Youngberg |
| Brad Breeding, J Powell, Damon McGilton and T Leonard |
| 4:2020cv00876 |
| July 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Charles J Youngberg. (kdr) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles J Youngberg. (kdr) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying without prejudice #1 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees; directing the Clerk to mail to Mr. Youngberg an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees, including calculation sheet; and directing Mr. Youngberg to submit within 30 days of the date of this Order either: (1) the statutory filing fee $400; or (2) a proper and complete Affidavit, along with a calculation sheet and certificate, in support of his Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 08/10/2020. (ajt) (Docket text modified on 8/11/2020 to correct a typographical error)(jak)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Charles J Youngberg. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles J Youngberg. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
