PerfectVision Manufacturing Inc v. EpuVision SA
Plaintiff: PerfectVision Manufacturing Inc
Defendant: EpuVision SA
Case Number: 4:2020cv00884
Filed: August 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: D P Marshall
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2021 Filing 13 JUDGMENT: PerfectVision's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/17/2021. (jak)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER dismissing the complaint for failure to serve process. The Court suggests that Perfect Vision make solid arrangements for service before refiling its case. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/17/2021. (jak)
August 30, 2021 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #11 MOTION for Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to indicate the document was filed in error (proposed order). (jak)
August 27, 2021 Filing 11 DOCKET ENTRY FILED IN ERROR - DISREGARD (Gershner, Stephen) (Docket text modified on 8/30/2021 to indicate the document was filed in error) (jak)
August 27, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Extend Time to Serve Defendants by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1-A-4 to Fourth Motion to Extend Time to Serve, #2 Exhibit B-1 - B-3 to Fourth Motion to Extend Time to Serve, #3 Exhibit C-1 - C-7 to Fourth Motion to Extend Time to Serve Defendant, #4 Exhibit D to Fourth Motion to Extend Time to Serve Def)(Gershner, Stephen)
May 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 PerfectVision's motion. The time to serve EpuVision is extended to 09/08/2021. No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 05/28/2021. (ajt) (Docket text modified on 6/1/2021 to correct typographical error.)(cmn)
May 24, 2021 Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER relating to Doc. #7 File in Error by All Plaintiffs. Please Disregard (Gershner, Stephen)(Docket text modified on 5/24/2021 to indicate the document was filed in error)(jak)
May 24, 2021 Filing 7 Third MOTION to Extend Time To Serve Letters Rogatory With Summons and Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A1-A4, #2 Exhibit B1-B3, #3 Exhibit C1-C7)(Gershner, Stephen)
May 24, 2021 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #8 MOTION for Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to indicate the document was a proposed order filed in error pursuant to instruction from Chambers. (jak)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend Time. The time to serve EpuVision is extended to 06/08/2021. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 02/23/2021. (wbb)
February 12, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to Serve Summons and Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award by PerfectVision Manufacturing Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1 thru A-4, #2 Exhibit B-1 thru B-3)(Gershner, Stephen)
October 8, 2020 Filing 4 LETTERS ROGATORY issued as to EpuVision SA pursuant to #3 Order and returned to Plaintiff's counsel for service. (thd)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting as modified #2 Motion. PerfectVision must either confirm with chambers that it has final versions of the Letters or provide the Clerk of the Court with final versions of its Letters to be issued. The Court also grants PerfectVision a four-month extension to serve process by 3/4/2021. And the Court grants PerfectVision's request to extend the period for EpuVision to respond to the petition within 45 days after service. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/25/2020. (jak)
September 18, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Issuance Ex-Parte Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory and to Extend The Time for Service by PerfectVision Manufacturing Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - part 1, #2 Exhibit A - part 2, #3 Exhibit A - part 3, #4 Exhibit A - part 4)(Gershner, Stephen)
August 4, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD against EpuVision SA filed by PerfectVision Manufacturing Inc. (Fee $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT078338.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PerfectVision Manufacturing Inc v. EpuVision SA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PerfectVision Manufacturing Inc
Represented By: Stephen L. Gershner
Represented By: Charles D. Davidson
Represented By: Charles Darwin Davidson, Sr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EpuVision SA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?