St John v. Ozark Pizza Company LLC et al
Diana St John |
Kirk Brown, Eric Murphy and Ozark Pizza Company LLC |
4:2020cv00889 |
August 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Brian S Miller |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diana St John. Eric Murphy served on 8/19/2020. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diana St John. Kirk Brown served on 8/14/2020. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diana St John. Ozark Pizza Company LLC served on 8/13/2020. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 4 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by William R. Stukenberg. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 09/03/2020. (rmg) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by William R. Stukenberg. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-3796157. Filed by All Defendants (Stukenberg, William) |
Filing 2 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Kirk Brown, Eric Murphy, Ozark Pizza Company LLC.(Stukenberg, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT-COLLECTIVE ACTION against All Defendants, filed by Diana St John. Fee of $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT078379. Summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.