Dennis v. Graves et al
| Darrell Dennis |
| William Straughn, Rodney Ford, Cynthia Harris, Dexter Paine, Solomon Graves, Jared Byers and Melissa Sheppard |
| 4:2020cv01017 |
| August 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ljb) |
Filing 14
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #13 Order entered separately today, the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice and this case is closed. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/15/2020. (ljb)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER adopting #6 Recommendation in its entirety as its findings in all respects; denying as moot #7 , #8 , #9 , and #11 motions; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Dismissal of this action is a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/15/2020. (ljb)
|
| Filing 12 OBJECTION to #6 Report and Recommendations by Darrell Dennis. (kdr) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by Darrell Dennis. (kdr) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support re #9 Motion for Leave to Amend filed by Darrell Dennis. (kdr) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Amend #2 Complaint by Darrell Dennis. (kdr) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Memorandum of Law by Darrell Dennis. (ljb) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint by Darrell Dennis. (ljb) |
|
Filing 6
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #2 Complaint be dismissed without prejudice; recommending dismissal count as a "strike"; and recommending the Court certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/31/2020. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 IFP Application; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk to mail a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Maximum Security Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, and the ADC Compliance Office. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/31/2020. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 4
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction and for TRO #3 . Plaintiff's motion fails to comply with LR 7.2(e) which states, "Pretrial motions for temporary restraining orders, motions for preliminary injunctions, and motions to dismiss, shall not be taken up and considered unless set forth in a separate pleading accompanied by a separate brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/28/2020. (lej)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by Darrell Dennis. (llg) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Darrell Dennis. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darrell Dennis. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
