Bailey et al v. Care Above All Care Inc et al
Plaintiff: Mark Daniels and Nukol Bailey
Defendant: Leanna Godley and Care Above All Care Inc
Case Number: 4:2020cv01058
Filed: September 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Kristine G Baker
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2020 Filing 8 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 12/28/2020; Rule 26(f) Report due by 1/12/2021; Bench Trial set for sometime during the week of 12/6/2021 at 09:00 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # 4D before Judge Kristine G. Baker. Signed at the direction of the Court on 10/28/2020. (tmw)
October 27, 2020 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Care Above All Care Inc, Leanna Godley.(Jones, Daveante)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 motion to extend time. Defendants may answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before 10/28/2020. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/14/2020. (jbh)
October 14, 2020 Set Deadlines: Answer to Complaint due 10/28/2020. (jbh)
October 13, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Daveante Jones on behalf of Care Above All Care Inc, Leanna Godley (Jones, Daveante)
October 13, 2020 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time of Responsive Pleading Deadline by Care Above All Care Inc, Leanna Godley (Jones, Daveante)
October 6, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nukol Bailey. Leanna Godley served on 9/20/2020. (Sanford, Joshua)
October 6, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nukol Bailey. Care Above All Care Inc served on 9/20/2020. (Sanford, Joshua)
September 1, 2020 Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - COLLECTIVE ACTION against All Defendants, filed by Mark Daniels, Nukol Bailey. Summons issued and returned to counsel for service. (Fee of $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT078715.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey et al v. Care Above All Care Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Daniels
Represented By: Blake Parker Hoyt
Represented By: Joshua Sanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nukol Bailey
Represented By: Blake Parker Hoyt
Represented By: Joshua Sanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leanna Godley
Represented By: Daveante Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Care Above All Care Inc
Represented By: Daveante Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?