Randle v. Pulaski County et al
Plaintiff: Leodis Randle
Defendant: Eric Higgens, Pulaski County and Doe
Case Number: 4:2020cv01103
Filed: September 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Lee P Rudofsky
Referring Judge: Joe J Volpe
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2020 Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTION to #5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Leodis Randle. (ljb)
October 27, 2020 Filing 7 OBJECTION to #5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Leodis Randle. (llg)
October 19, 2020 Filing 6 APPEAL of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court re #4 Order by Leodis Randle. (ajt)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice #1 . The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any order adopting these recommendations and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/19/2020. (lej)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration #3 . It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff must submit the statutory filing fee of $400 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number, within 14 days of the date of this order if he wishes to proceed with this action. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/1/2020. (lej)
September 29, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Reconsideration re #2 Order by Leodis Randle. (ljb)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER that Plaintiff must submit the statutory filing fee of $400 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number, within 14 days of the date of this order if he wishes to proceed with this action. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 9/17/2020. (lej)
September 14, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Leodis Randle. (llg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Randle v. Pulaski County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Higgens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pulaski County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leodis Randle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?