Stowell Investments Inc v. Broday et al
Plaintiff: Stowell Investments Inc
Defendant: Kimberly A Holmes and Martha W Broday
Case Number: 4:2020cv01169
Filed: October 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: D P Marshall
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2020 Filing 12 JUDGMENT: Stowell Investments' claims are dismissed without prejudice for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/17/2020. (jak)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/17/2020. (jak)
November 13, 2020 Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by All Defendants. (Castleberry, Kenneth)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: Unopposed motion, Doc. #8 , granted. Reply due by 13 November 2020. In the future, any moving party may reply within seven calendar days of a response. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/9/2020. (slb)
November 9, 2020 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File reply in support of motion to dismiss by Martha W Broday, Kimberly A Holmes (Castleberry, Kenneth)
November 6, 2020 Filing 7 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #6 Response to Motion to Dismiss filed by Stowell Investments Inc. (James, Patrick)
November 6, 2020 Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Stowell Investments Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 15-17)(James, Patrick)
October 23, 2020 Filing 5 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #4 Motion to Dismiss filed by All Defendants. (Castleberry, Kenneth)
October 23, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by All Defendants (Castleberry, Kenneth)
October 9, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stowell Investments Inc. Kimberly A Holmes served on 10/9/2020. (James, Patrick)
October 7, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stowell Investments Inc. Martha W Broday served on 10/7/2020. (James, Patrick)
October 1, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT against All Defendants filed by Stowell Investments Inc. (Fee $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT079127.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stowell Investments Inc v. Broday et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kimberly A Holmes
Represented By: Kenneth P. Castleberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martha W Broday
Represented By: Kenneth P. Castleberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stowell Investments Inc
Represented By: Patrick R. James
Represented By: Zachary D. Wilson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?