Bishop v. Huff et al
Plaintiff: Benjamin A Bishop
Defendant: Gary Musselwhite and Ramona Huff
Case Number: 4:2020cv01243
Filed: October 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Kristine G Baker
Referring Judge: Beth Deere
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2020 Filing 9 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Gary Musselwhite.(Middleton, Rosalyn)
November 12, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Rosalyn L. Middleton on behalf of Gary Musselwhite (Middleton, Rosalyn)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare a new summons for Defendant Huff; directing the U.S. Marshal to serve Defendant Huff with a summons and a copy of the #2 complaint, with any attachments, without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 11/5/2020. (jbh)
November 5, 2020 Summons Reissued as to Ramona Huff and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (jbh)
November 2, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Ramona Huff. (bmd)
November 2, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Gary Musselwhite served on 10/30/2020. (bmd)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to prepare summonses for Defendants Huff and Musselwhite and the United States Marshal to serve these Defendants with summonses and copies of #2 Complaint, with any attachments, without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 10/26/2020. (ljb)
October 26, 2020 Summons Issued as to Ramona Huff, Gary Musselwhite and forwarded to USMS for service. (ajt)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS granting #1 IFP motion; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Order to the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, the ADC Compliance Division, and the Warden of the Pine Bluff Unit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 10/20/2020. (jbh)
October 16, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Benjamin A Bishop.(kdr)
October 16, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Benjamin A Bishop. (kdr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bishop v. Huff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Musselwhite
Represented By: Rosalyn L. Middleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ramona Huff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benjamin A Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?