Hopkins v. Calais Forest Equity Enterprises LLC et al
| Holly Hopkins |
| National Property Management Associates Inc, Napa Valley Equity Enterprises LLC and Calais Forest Equity Enterprises LLC |
| 4:2021cv00024 |
| January 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Church Campbell on behalf of All Defendants (Campbell, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 4
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 4/21/2021 and Jury Trial set for 5/2/2022 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock, Arkansas Courtroom #2A before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 1/29/2021. (hml)
|
|
Filing 3
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Calais Forest Equity Enterprises LLC, Napa Valley Equity Enterprises LLC, National Property Management Associates Inc.(Moore, Michael)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael S. Moore on behalf of Calais Forest Equity Enterprises LLC, Napa Valley Equity Enterprises LLC, National Property Management Associates Inc (Moore, Michael)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Holly Hopkins. (Fee $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT080435.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
