Davis v. Arkansas, State of
Larry David Davis |
Arkansas, State of |
4:2021cv00070 |
January 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Beth Deere |
James M Moody |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Larry David Davis: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to pay the fee in the district court or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of this order. (ajt) |
Filing 13 ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Larry David Davis: The Clerk of the district court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER. (ajt) |
Filing 12 USCA Docketing Letter as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Larry David Davis. USCA Case Number 21-1583. (ajt) |
Filing 11 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to #7 Notice of Appeal re #5 Order and #6 Judgment. (ajt) |
Filing 10 ORDER denying 8 motion for certificate of appealability; and denying #9 motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 03/11/2021. (ajt) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Larry David Davis. (ajt) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability re #7 Notice of Appeal as to Larry David Davis (Administrative entry by Clerk's office. No document attached to this entry). (ajt) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Order and #6 Judgment by Larry David Davis. (ajt) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT: Consistent with #5 Order that was entered on this day, Larry David Davis's #2 petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/22/2021. (ljb) |
Filing 5 ORDER adopting #3 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; and dismissing, without prejudice, #2 Mr. Davis's petition for writ of habeas corpus. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/22/2021. (ljb) |
Filing 4 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by Larry David Davis. (kdr) |
Filing 3 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION that #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Larry David Davis be dismissed, without prejudice. #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied, as moot. Objections due within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 2/1/2021. (csf) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Larry David Davis. (ljb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Larry David Davis. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Davis v. Arkansas, State of | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Larry David Davis | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Arkansas, State of | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.