Humphrey v. Payton
| Marion Andrew Humphrey, Jr |
| Steven Payton |
| 4:2021cv00194 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 7/6/2021 and Jury Trial set for 6/27/2022 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock, Arkansas Courtroom #2A before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 4/14/2021. (hml)
|
|
Filing 10
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Steven Payton.(Bird, William)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by William C. Bird, III on behalf of Steven Payton (Bird, William)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marion Andrew Humphrey, Jr. Steven Payton served on 3/22/2021. (fjg)
|
|
Filing 7
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Andrew J. Noel. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 03/12/2021. (kla)
|
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Marc E. Betinsky. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 03/12/2021. (kla)
|
|
Filing 5
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Robert Bennett. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 03/12/2021. (kla)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Andrew J. Noel. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-3967076. Filed by Marion Andrew Humphrey, Jr (Neal, Emily)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Marc E. Betinsky. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-3967068. Filed by Marion Andrew Humphrey, Jr (Neal, Emily)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Robert Bennett. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-3967066. Filed by Marion Andrew Humphrey, Jr (Neal, Emily)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Steven Payton filed by Marion Andrew Humphrey, Jr. (Fee $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT081229.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Humphrey v. Payton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marion Andrew Humphrey, Jr | |
| Represented By: | William Conner Eldridge, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Andrew J. Noel |
| Represented By: | Emily A. Neal |
| Represented By: | Robert Bennett |
| Represented By: | Marc E. Betinsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Steven Payton | |
| Represented By: | William C. Bird, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
