Henry v. Gibson et al
James K Henry |
K Flud and J Gibson |
4:2021cv00206 |
March 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Beth Deere |
Brian S Miller |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment by James K Henry. (ljb) |
Filing 14 REQUEST for Production of Documents by James K Henry. (ljb) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Interrogatories and Production of Documents by James K Henry. (ljb) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition to #11 Scheduling Order by James K Henry. (ljb) |
|
Filing 10 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court. (csf) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by K Flud, J Gibson.(Jones, Jamie Marie) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by James K Henry. (jak) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed. K Flud served on 4/5/2021. (bmd) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed. J Gibson served on 4/5/2021. (llg) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by James K Henry. (ljb) |
|
|
Summons Issued as to K Flud, J Gibson and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (jbh) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by James K Henry. (ljb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James K Henry. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.