Scott II v. USA
| Gene Edward Scott II |
| United States Government and USA |
| 4:2021cv00281 |
| April 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER denying #13 , #14 , #15 , #16 , and #17 motions. The Court is now precluding the Clerk of Court from accepting any further filings in this case (except if the Court explicitly permits it) because Mr. Scott's motions continue to be redundant, frivolous, and incoherent. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Mr. Scott a copy of the docket and its contents. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 06/04/2021. (ajt)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION to Add Filing Fee Payment and to Maintain Open Case by Gene Edward Scott II. (jap) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Move the Case Hereto to the Veterans Court of Venue by Gene Edward Scott II.(jap) |
| Filing 15 MOTION Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rule 34(a)(1)(A)(B) by Gene Edward Scott II. (jap) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Admitting for Petition and Statement of Claim and Relief by Gene Edward Scott II. (jap) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Reopening Case by Gene Edward Scott II. (jap) |
|
Filing 12
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #11 Motion for Order. Plaintiff is warned that additional redundant filings will cause the Court to issue an Order preventing further filings in this matter absent pre-approval. This case is closed. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 5/19/2021. (hml)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Order filed by Gene Edward Scott II. (fjg) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #10 Notice. CORRECTION: The docket entry was modified to correct the file date as 5/3/2021 as marked on the document. (jak) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Gene Edward Scott II. (jap) (Docket entry modified on 5/4/2021 to correct the file date) (jak) |
|
Filing 9
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #8 Motion for Order. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 5/3/2021. (hml)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Order by Gene Edward Scott II. (jap) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #5 , #6 Motions for Order. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 04/26/2021. (ajt)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Order by Gene Edward Scott II. (jap) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Order by Gene Edward Scott II. (jap) |
|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #3 Order that was entered on this day, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 04/13/2021. (ajt)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing without prejudice #2 Complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 04/13/2021. (ajt)
|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to indicate the document is filed against Defendant USA. (thd) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against USA filed by Gene Edward Scott II.(ajt) (Docket text modified on 4/12/2021 to correct defendant's name to be USA.) (thd). |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gene Edward Scott II. (ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
