Henson v. Ross Stores Inc et al
| Gary Henson |
| Ross Stores Inc and John Doe |
| 4:2021cv00294 |
| April 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 6/25/2021. Jury Trial set for 12/12/2022 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom #1A before Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. Signed at the direction of the Court on 5/13/2021. (slb) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Ross Stores Inc.(Markham, Amy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy C. Markham on behalf of Ross Stores Inc (Markham, Amy) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service Ross Stores, filed by Gary Henson. Ross Stores Inc served on 4/29/2021. (McDaniel, Bobby) |
| Summons Reissued as to Ross Stores Inc. Returned to Plaintiff's counsel for service. (jak) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service , filed by Gary Henson. Ross Stores Inc served on 4/20/2021. (McDaniel, Bobby) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT by Gary Henson. (ajt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Ross Stores Inc, John Doe filed by Gary Henson. (Fee $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT081655.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
