Maddox v. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Neal K Maddox |
Department of Housing and Urban Development |
4:2021cv00353 |
May 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Brian S Miller |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 USCA Docketing Letter and Briefing Schedule as to #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Neal K Maddox. USCA Case Number 21-2461. (ajt) |
Filing 11 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to #10 Notice of Appeal re #8 Order and #9 Judgment. (ajt) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #8 Order and #9 Judgment by Neal K Maddox. Filing fee $505 paid, receipt number LIT082695. (ajt) |
Filing 9 JUDGMENT: Consistent with #8 order entered today, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/15/2021. (ljb) |
Filing 8 ORDER dismissing Neal K. Maddox's complaint without prejudice. An appeal of this order will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/15/2021. (ljb) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE re #6 Order by Neal K Maddox. (jap) |
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) DOCKET NOTE: This case is assigned to the docket of United States District Judge Brian S. Miller. Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin is now associated to this case due to the retirement of Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 6/1/2021. (ajt) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying #5 Neal Maddox's motion for recusal, and directing him to amend his complaint and refile his in forma pauperis motion by 6/11/2021, or his case will be dismissed. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/25/2021. (kdr) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Order by Neal K Maddox. (jap) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying 1 Maddox's request to proceed in forma pauperis; directing the Clerk to send Maddox a motion to proceed in forma pauperis; directing Maddox to refile his ifp motion and to amend his complaint to provide detailed allegations by 6/11/2021; directing him to attach the right to sue letter; and denying the request for appointment of counsel. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/10/2021. (kdr) |
Filing 3 ORDER provisionally granting 1 Application for Leave toProceed In Forma Pauperis, pursuant to General Order No. 29. Signed at thedirection of the Court on on 5/3/2021. (kdr) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Department of Housing and Urban Development, filed by Neal K Maddox.(kdr) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Neal K Maddox. (Document not attached. See DE #2 .) (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Maddox v. Department of Housing and Urban Development | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Neal K Maddox | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Department of Housing and Urban Development | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.