London v. McDaniel et al
Barry D London |
C Owens, Does "Book-In", "Nurse Supervisor", "Dentist", "Dentist Assistant", "Transfer Officer", David Norwood, Doug Woods, Stephanie Holmes, Kyle McDaniel, Bush and Nathan Lane |
4:2021cv00449 |
May 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Kristine G Baker |
Joe J Volpe |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 E-MAIL received from U.S. District Court Western District of Arkansas, confirming the case was received and opened in their district as case number 1:21-cv-01025. (jak) |
Filing 5 ORDER directing the Clerk to immediately transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 5/26/2021. (lej) |
Docket Note: Case electronically transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas on this date. (jbh) |
Filing 4 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for service #3 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 5/25/2021. (lej) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Service by Barry D London. (llg) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Barry D London. (llg) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Barry D London. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.