Adelsberger et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
| Darel Adelsberger and Annette Adelsberger |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| 4:2021cv00471 |
| June 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 8/10/2021; Rule 26(f) Report due by 8/24/2021. Proposed Jury Trial set sometime during the week of 8/1/2022 at 9:15 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # 4A before Judge James M. Moody Jr. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 6/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Final Scheduling Order)(kog)(Docket text modified on 6/7/2021 to correct a typographical error) (jak) |
| Filing 3 Union Pacific Railroad Company's ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Jones, Jamie Marie) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Union Pacific Railroad Company filed by Darel Adelsberger, Annette Adelsberger.(ajt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Union Pacific Railroad Company from Pulaski County Circuit Court, case number 60CV-21-2065. Fee $402 paid, receipt number LIT082321. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
