JS Jonesboro LLC et al v. Southern Roofing & Construction Inc et al
JS Jonesboro LLC doing business as Southern Roofing and Renovations Jonesboro, Aaron Grigsby and Christopher Eubank |
Nicholas Rynders and Southern Roofing & Construction Inc |
4:2021cv00492 |
June 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher Eubank, JS Jonesboro LLC, Aaron Grigsby. Southern Roofing & Construction Inc served on 6/25/2021. (Futhey, Malcolm) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher Eubank, JS Jonesboro LLC, Aaron Grigsby. Nicholas Rynders served on 6/25/2021. (Futhey, Malcolm) |
Filing 4 REPORT on the Filing or Determination of an Action regarding a Trademark submitted by the Clerk's Office to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on 6/11/2021. (cdw) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT by Aaron Grigsby. (jbh) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by JS Jonesboro LLC. (jbh) |
Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR MONETARY DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Nicholas Rynders, Southern Roofing & Construction Inc, filed by Christopher Eubank, JS Jonesboro LLC, Aaron Grigsby. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT082415.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.