Stringer v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
| Daisy L Stringer |
| Arkansas Department of Human Services |
| 4:2021cv00593 |
| June 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: Consistent with 7 Order that was entered on this day, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 08/17/2021. (ajt)
|
|
Filing 7
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: On July 28, 2021, I issued an Order dismissing this case without prejudice. My Order explained the legal deficiencies of Ms. Stringers Complaint and noted that I would hold the Judgment for 30 days to see whether Ms. Stringer could file an Amended Complaint that remedied the deficiencies I pointed at. While Ms. Stringer has filed an Amended Complaint, it is still legally deficient. The Amended Complaint - to the extent I can decipher its meaning - does not add anything to change the previous analysis. Accordingly, Judgment should be entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 8/17/2021. (hml)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Arkansas Department of Human Services filed by Daisy L Stringer. (Docketed pursuant to direction from Chambers) (jap) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; and denying #3 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel without prejudice. The Complaint should be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Before issuing the Judgment, however, I will wait 30 days from the date of this Order to see if Ms. Stringer amends her Complaint in a way that rectifies the deficiencies identified above. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 7/28/2021. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER provisionally granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, pursuant to General Order No. 29. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 06/30/2021.(ajt)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Daisy L Stringer. (ajt) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Arkansas Department of Human Services filed by Daisy L Stringer.(ajt) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daisy L Stringer. (ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stringer v. Arkansas Department of Human Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arkansas Department of Human Services | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daisy L Stringer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
