Miller v. Federal Express Corporation
| Talesa Miller |
| Federal Express Corporation |
| 4:2021cv00644 |
| July 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Accordingly, Daniel T. French is admitted Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 8/24/21. (mmb)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Daniel T. French. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4082868. Filed by Federal Express Corporation (Kim, Jane) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Federal Express Corporation (Ahearn, Christopher) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #6 Answer. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to remove duplicate text. (jak) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Federal Express Corporation (Ahearn, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Federal Express Corporation.(Ahearn, Christopher) (Docket text modified on 8/16/2021 to remove duplicate text)(jak) |
|
Filing 5
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Accordingly, Christopher M. Ahearn is admitted Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 8/6/21. (mmb)
|
| Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 10/14/2021. Rule 26(f) Report due by 10/28/2021. Bench Trial set for 8/9/2022 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # A401 before Judge Billy Roy Wilson. Entered at the direction of the Court on 8/6/21. (mmb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Christopher M. Ahearn. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4071069. Filed by Federal Express Corporation (Kim, Jane) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jane A. Kim on behalf of Federal Express Corporation (Kim, Jane) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Express Corporation, filed by Talesa Miller. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT082988.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miller v. Federal Express Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Talesa Miller | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Wesley Burks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Federal Express Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Christopher M. Ahearn |
| Represented By: | Daniel T. French |
| Represented By: | Jane A. Kim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
