Fort v. Fort et al
Plaintiff: Lonnell I Fort
Defendant: Herbert Fort and Does
Case Number: 4:2021cv00728
Filed: August 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Brian S Miller
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2021 Filing 11 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Lonnell I Fort re #7 Notice of Docket Correction re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (fjg)
October 5, 2021 Filing 10 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jbh)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JUDGMENT: Consistent with the #8 order entered today, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/5/2021. (jbh)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Lonnell Fort's #2 complaint is dismissed without prejudice because he failed to pay the filing fee or submit a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/5/2021. (jbh)
September 22, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (lack of file mark) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to docket entry #1 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak)
September 15, 2021 Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Lonnell I Fort re #3 Order, IFP application, including certificate and calculation sheet. (fjg)
September 2, 2021 Filing 5 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Lonnell I Fort re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #2 Complaint. (fjg)
August 31, 2021 Filing 4 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Lonnell I Fort re #3 Order. (fjg)
August 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice; directing Plaintiff to either pay the $402 filing fee or file a complete IFP application within 30 days, or his case will be dismissed without prejudice; and directing the Clerk to mail Plaintiff an IFP application, including certificate and calculation sheet, along with a copy of this order. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/19/2021. (jbh)
August 16, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Lonnell I Fort. (llg)
August 16, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lonnell I Fort. (llg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/22/2021: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fort v. Fort et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lonnell I Fort
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Herbert Fort
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?