Flores v. Jhonson et al
Adam Flores |
Tish Jhonson, Stan McGahee and Does 1-2, "Sgt. Christy" and "Deputy Chris" |
4:2021cv00780 |
September 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Edie R Ervin |
Lee P Rudofsky |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Adam Flores re #2 Initial Order for Pro Se Prisoner-Plaintiffs and IFP Application. (fjg) |
Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Adam Flores re #4 Order. (fjg) |
Filing 5 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Adam Flores re #2 Initial Order for Pro Se Prisoner-Plaintiffs. (fjg) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing Mr. Flores to notify the Court of his current address within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 9/16/2021. (jbh) |
Filing 3 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Adam Flores re #1 Complaint. (fjg) |
Filing 2 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS directing the Clerk to enclose an IFP application, along with a copy of this Order; and directing Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application, including an accompanying affidavit and jail account information sheet, or pay a $402.00 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 9/7/2021. (jbh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Adam Flores.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.