Owren v. Miller et al
Plaintiff: Bradley Dean Owren
Defendant: Phillip Miller and Clayton Edwards
Case Number: 4:2021cv00927
Filed: October 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Kristine G Baker
Referring Judge: Joe J Volpe
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed with his due process claim against Defendant Edwards in his individual capacity, and all other claims in the complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted #2 . Defendant Miller be dismissed without prejudice as a party to this lawsuit. The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from an order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/17/2021. (lej)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons and the USM to serve Defendant Edwards without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/17/2021. (lej)
November 17, 2021 Summons Issued as to Clayton Edwards and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (jbh)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting Plaintiff's IFP Application #1 . The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the White County Detention Center Jail Administrator. Service is not appropriate at this time. The Clerk shall mail a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint form to Plaintiff with a copy of this order. If Plaintiff wishes to amend the complaint, he must complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, mark it as "Amended Complaint," and file it within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's complaint, as it now stands, is partially deficient and some of his claims may be dismissed after 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/14/2021. (lej)
October 12, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Bradley Dean Owren.(kdr)
October 12, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bradley Dean Owren. (kdr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Owren v. Miller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bradley Dean Owren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillip Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clayton Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?