Westerman v. Hutchinson et al
| Marion Westerman |
| Asa Hutchinson, Leslie Ruthledge, Nathaniel Smith, Solomon Graves, Dexter Payne, Marshall Dale Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Gary Musselwhite, Tammy Allen and Does 1-103, Arkansas State Legislatures, Director of Medical Services, ADC, Director of Mental Health Services, ADC |
| 4:2021cv00949 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Based on #3 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. (jak) |
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to immediately transfer this case to the Honorable Lee P. Rudofsky. Further, this case should be consolidated with the master docket in Hayes v. Rutledge, et al., 4:21-cv-00347-LPR. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/12/2021. (jbh)
|
| Cases associated. Create association to 4:21-cv-00347-LPR pursuant to #3 Order. (jak) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Marion Westerman.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marion Westerman. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
