State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company v. Lensing et al
| State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company |
| Kelley Lensing, Joseph Lensing, Teresa Sturch and Rustey Williams |
| 4:2021cv01080 |
| November 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Kelley Lensing.(Sutterfield, Michael)
|
|
Filing 6
AFFIDAVIT of Service , filed by State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company. Kelley Lensing served on 11/29/2021. (Wineland, Teresa)
|
|
Filing 5
AFFIDAVIT of Service , filed by State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company. Joseph Lensing served on 11/29/2021. (Wineland, Teresa)
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Teresa Sturch.(Norwood, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to File Reference List under Seal by State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company. (Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT084468.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
