Holder et al v. Bid Group Construction US Inc
Christopher Holder and Randall Taylor |
Bid Group Construction US Inc |
4:2021cv01086 |
November 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Billy Roy Wilson |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Shelby Nicole Howlett on behalf of Bid Group Construction US Inc (Howlett, Shelby) |
Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 2/14/2022. Rule 26(f) Report due by 2/28/2022. Bench Trial set for 12/6/2022 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # A401 before Judge Billy Roy Wilson. Entered at the direction of the Court on 12/7/21. (mmb) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Bid Group Construction US Inc (Kim, Jane) |
Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint -Collective Action by Bid Group Construction US Inc.(Kim, Jane) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jane A. Kim on behalf of Bid Group Construction US Inc (Kim, Jane) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher Holder. Bid Group Construction US Inc served on 11/17/2021. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - COLLECTIVE ACTION against Bid Group Construction US Inc, filed by Christopher Holder, Randall Taylor. (Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT084491.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.